Skip to main contentRemandedPlaintiff WinDefendant WinRemandedDefendant Win
D. UtahNovember 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00290
Defendant Win
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
- State
- Utah
- Circuit
- 10th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Harassment
Outcome
The appellate court vacated the harassment prevention order against the defendant, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove qualifying acts of harassment under Massachusetts law and that the order was based on constitutionally protected speech rather than true threats or fighting words.
Browse more:Harassment cases
Similar Rulings
Sylvia Dominguez-Curry v. Nevada Transportation Department Roc Stacey
9th CircuitSep 2005
Roby v. McKesson Corp.
Cal. SupremeNov 2009
Jackson v. NYS Department of Labor
S.D.N.Y.Apr 2010
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.
D.C. CircuitJul 1998
McClung
Cal. SupremeNov 2004
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.