Skip to main contentMixed ResultPlaintiff WinMixed ResultDefendant WinPlaintiff Win
D. Md.November 26, 2025No. 8:24-cv-01248
Plaintiff WinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- 4th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
HarassmentRetaliation
Outcome
The court denied defendants' motion to compel arbitration and granted plaintiff's motion to remand to state court, finding that plaintiff's sexual harassment and retaliation claims are not arbitrable under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA).
Similar Rulings
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Elana Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District, John J. Russell, Anne Brennan, Marilyn Wishnie
2nd CircuitApr 2004
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
U.S. Supreme CourtJan 2012
Great Dane Trailers
U.S. Supreme CourtJun 1967
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.