Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Boggs
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appellate affirmance
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The trial court's judgment in favor of the defendant was affirmed because the plaintiff's discrimination and retaliation claims based on constructive discharge were time-barred under Ohio Revised Code § 4112.052(C), and the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not alleging constructive discharge in his OCRC charge.
Excerpt
Appellant's assignments of error, which challenged the trial court's determination that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies because he did not allege in his charge to the Ohio Civil Rights Commission that he had been constructively discharged, were moot because appellant did not assign as error the trial court's independent determination that his claims of discrimination and retaliation predicated on constructive discharge were time-barred under R.C. 4112.052(C). Trial court's judgment is affirmed on that unchallenged basis.
Similar Rulings
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.