Kenneth M. Kuller, Relator v. TVI, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...
Case Details
- Status
- Unpublished
- Procedural Posture
- appeal of unemployment benefits denial decision
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court affirmed the unemployment benefits decision, finding that the relator engaged in employment misconduct by violating known workplace policies, making him ineligible for unemployment benefits.
Excerpt
Relator Kenneth Kuller challenges a decision affirming his ineligibility for unemployment benefits from respondent Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). Kuller advances two arguments on appeal. He asserts first that the unemployment law judge (ULJ) failed to consider new evidence submitted at an evidentiary hearing. He argues second that the record lacks substantial evidence that his conduct violated any workplace policies and constituted employment misconduct. We conclude that the ULJ's decision reflects careful consideration of the relevant evidence and that relator engaged in employment misconduct by violating known and acknowledged employment policies, and we affirm.
Similar Rulings
Relator challenges the decision of the unemployment-law judge (ULJ) determining that because relator was discharged for employee misconduct, he is ineligible for unemployment benefits. We affirm.
In this certiorari appeal from the decision of an unemployment-law judge (ULJ), relator challenges the ULJ's conclusion that she is ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was discharged for employment misconduct. She argues that (1) the ULJ's determination that she was discharged for employment misconduct was not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) the ULJ erred by failing to consider any exceptions to ineligibility based on employment misconduct. Because we conclude that the ULJ's determination that relator was discharged for employment misconduct was supported by substantial evidence, and none of the statutory exceptions to ineligibility based employment misconduct apply, we affirm.
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.