Verduzco v. King County
Wash.June 11, 2026No. 103,749-0
Mixed ResultKing County Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
- State
- Washington
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
DiscriminationRetaliation
Outcome
The Washington Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case, finding the jury instruction combining definitions of "adverse employment action" from both discrimination and retaliation claims was misleading, but the employer failed to demonstrate reversible error. The jury had found no discrimination but did find retaliation.
Similar Rulings
Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.