Skip to main contentUnknownUnknownUnknownRemandedDismissed
Lee v. First Union National Bank
N.J.June 3, 2009No. A-58 September Term 2008Cited 35 times
Defendant WinFirst Union National Bank
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- LaVECCHIA
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the sale of securities is not covered under the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) and reversed the Appellate Division's decision, reinstating the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's CFA claim. The court found that securities are explicitly excluded from the CFA's definition of 'merchandise.'
Similar Rulings
Langevin
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.Mar 2011
Kevin O'Halloran v. First Union National Bank
11th CircuitApr 2009
Lee v. First Union National Bank
N.J.Nov 2008
Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Union Securities, Inc.
1st CircuitJan 2004
Neilson
C.D. Cal.Oct 2003
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.