Skip to main contentUnresolvableUnresolvableUnresolvableDefendant WinDefendant Win
Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.
Haw.April 20, 2020No. SCWC-19-0000095Cited 6 times
RemandedEckard Brandes, Inc.
Case Details
- Status
- Published
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Wage Theft
Outcome
The Hawaii Supreme Court vacated the Intermediate Court of Appeals' dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and remanded the case to the ICA to address the merits of the appeal, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in granting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal based on excusable neglect.
Browse more:Wage Theft cases
Similar Rulings
Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. ICA Order Dismissing Appellate Court Case Number CAAP-19-0000095 for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction, filed 05/21/2019 [ada]. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 07/19/2019. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 08/29/2019 [ada]. S.Ct. Opinion, filed 04/20/2020 [ada], 146 Haw. 354. S.Ct. Order of Correction, filed 04/27/2020 [ada]. ICA s.d.o., filed 04/25/2024 [ada], 154 Haw. 157. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 07/30/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 09/12/2024 [ada].
Haw.Sep 2025
Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Haw.Apr 2020
Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Haw.Aug 2019
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Adkins
4th CircuitAug 2002
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.