The court granted the Arizona Senate's motions in limine, precluding the plaintiff from introducing evidence of discrimination at trial on the retaliation claim (which already proceeded to a second trial), and barring evidence of back pay and benefits as those are court-determined equitable remedies rather than jury questions. The underlying discrimination claim had already resulted in a jury finding of liability for the Senate.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.