Skip to main contentMixed ResultDefendant WinDismissedMixed ResultRemanded
Case Details
- Nature of Suit
- 790 Labor: Other
- Status
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture
- appeal
- State
- California
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Breach of Contract
Outcome
The majority opinion held the defendant liable as a third-party beneficiary of a highway construction contract, but the dissent disagreed, arguing no breach of contract occurred and such liability was improper without a demonstrated breach. The case involves conflicting appellate views on third-party beneficiary status.
Browse more:Breach of Contract cases
Similar Rulings
DAVIS
S.D. Ind.Sep 2025
William Hornady v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
11th CircuitOct 2024
Madrid
E.D. Cal.Jul 2020
Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron Roeill
2nd CircuitJun 2002
Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada
11th CircuitDec 2005
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.