Lazer Spot, Inc.
44 federal employment cases from public court records (2011–2025)
2 with a published ruling · 42 open dockets
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Lazer Spot, Inc. as an employer in 44 employment matters between 2011 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Constructive Discharge, Failure To Accommodate, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 1 state (IN).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
About this employer
Lazer Spot, Inc. appears in 2 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Constructive Discharge, Failure to Accommodate, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Constructive Discharge, Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation.
Rulings span Indiana. Indiana is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Indiana rulings.
Claim Types
States
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.