Allstate Insurance Company
92 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1983–2026)
40 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 39 map to 35 distinct cases · 5 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Allstate Insurance Company as an employer in 92 distinct federal employment cases between 1983 and 2026.
Of the 40 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 25 ended in a ruling for the employer, 10 ended in a ruling for the worker, 3 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 were dismissed.
Plaintiffs won 10 of 37 adjudicated opinions (27%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 14 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 35 distinct cases.
10 of 37 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Allstate Insurance Company appears in 40 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Constantini v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (2022) — Defendant Win. Constantini applied for disability benefits through her employer's insurance plan but was denied. Instead of following the plan's appeal process to challenge the decision, she filed a lawsuit directly in court. Read the ruling.
Wehrly v. Allstate Insurance Company (2022) — Defendant Win. An employee named Wehrly filed a lawsuit against Allstate Insurance Company, claiming she faced discrimination based on her religion, endured a hostile work environment, and experienced retaliation at work. Read the ruling.
Smith v. Allstate Ins. Co. (2019) — Defendant Win. Smith filed a lawsuit against Allstate Insurance Company claiming he was fired in retaliation for protected conduct and that his termination was wrongful. Smith also alleged discrimination. He argued that the company should have to pay him damages for these violations. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (16 of 40), Discrimination (9 of 40), Wrongful Termination (5 of 40). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span California (5), Alabama (2), Mississippi (2), Georgia (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Alabama rulings, Mississippi rulings and Georgia rulings.
These published opinions sit within the insurance sector, where claims-adjuster wage-and-hour disputes, age-discrimination, and whistleblower-retaliation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
39 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 14 summary-judgment opinions, 10 ended the case in Allstate Insurance Company’s favor and 4 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Insurance employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.