No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court's denial of the defendant college's motion to dismiss. The college's political subdivision immunity was upheld for some claims but the court found that disability discrimination and retaliation claims survived immunity challenges and remanded for further proceedings.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Immunity of political subdivision employee judgment on the pleadings reverse racial discrimination R.C. 2744.03(A) R.C. 2744.09. Plaintiff's complaint for claims of reverse racial discrimination, harassment, and retaliation contained sufficient allegations for the liability of defendant political subdivision employee pursuant to the exceptions to immunity set forth in R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(a) and (b). The trial court properly denied defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.