Calo v. G.N.P.H. Nine d/b/a Golden Nugget Pancake House

N.D. Ill.May 11, 2022No. 1:21-cv-06918

Mixed ResultG.N.P.H. # Nine, Inc. (Golden Nugget Pancake House)

Case Details

Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Status: Unknown
Procedural Posture: motion to dismiss
State: Illinois
Circuit: 7th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftDiscriminationRetaliationHarassment

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' 18 affirmative defenses in this FLSA and wage-and-hour case; several defenses were stricken without prejudice for insufficient factual pleading, others were withdrawn by defendants, and some were allowed to stand.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Dismisses Wage Lawsuit Against Golden Nugget Pancake House** A worker named Calo sued Golden Nugget Pancake House claiming the restaurant violated federal wage laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA requires employers to pay minimum wage and overtime to eligible workers. Calo alleged that the restaurant failed to follow these wage requirements, though the specific details of the violation are not provided in the available information. The federal court in Illinois dismissed Calo's lawsuit in May 2022. When a court dismisses a case, it means the lawsuit was thrown out and the worker cannot proceed with their claims. No damages were awarded to the employee. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that winning wage violation lawsuits isn't guaranteed, even when workers believe their rights were violated. Courts can dismiss cases for various reasons - perhaps the worker didn't provide enough evidence, missed important deadlines, or failed to meet legal requirements for filing the claim. For workers considering wage violation lawsuits, this highlights the importance of keeping detailed records of hours worked and pay received, and consulting with employment attorneys who can properly prepare and present these complex cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases Discrimination cases Retaliation cases Harassment cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB

U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938

Mixed Result

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church

D.C. CircuitJul 1997

Remanded

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941

Plaintiff Win

Read Full Opinion More G.N.P.H. # Nine, Inc. (Golden Nugget Pancake House) Rulings All Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check Your Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.