Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Cabrera v. Service Employees International Union

D. Nev.May 19, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00304

Case Details

Nature of Suit
720 Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status
Unknown
Procedural Posture
motion to dismiss
State
Nevada
Circuit
9th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentHostile Work EnvironmentFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court dismissed Plaintiffs' ADA and Nevada state law discrimination and retaliation claims for failure to adequately plead exhaustion of administrative remedies, finding administrative exhaustion to be a jurisdictional prerequisite under Ninth Circuit precedent.

What This Ruling Means

**Cabrera v. Service Employees International Union: Court Dismisses Discrimination Case Over Procedural Requirements** This case involved workers who sued their union employer, the Service Employees International Union, claiming they faced discrimination, retaliation, and harassment based on disability. The workers also alleged their employer failed to provide reasonable accommodations and created a hostile work environment. The court dismissed the entire case without examining whether discrimination actually occurred. Instead, the judge ruled that the workers failed to properly complete required administrative steps before filing their lawsuit. Under federal law, workers must first file complaints with government agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and exhaust those processes before going to court. The court found this requirement to be mandatory and dismissed all claims related to disability discrimination and retaliation. This ruling matters because it highlights a critical procedural hurdle workers face when pursuing discrimination claims. Even if you have a strong case, you must follow specific steps in the correct order, or courts can dismiss your lawsuit entirely. Workers experiencing discrimination should file complaints with appropriate government agencies first and complete those processes before considering court action. Missing these procedural requirements can end your case before it begins, regardless of the merits of your claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.