10 employment law court rulings from public federal records (2019–2025)
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC appears in 10 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Discrimination (2 of 10), Wage Theft (2 of 10), Harassment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Harassment.
Rulings span California (2), Nevada (1), Florida (1), Wisconsin (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Nevada rulings, Florida rulings and Wisconsin rulings.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Belinda LeMaire ("Employee") sustained an injury to her right foot while working forLowe's Home Centers, LLC ("Employer"). The claim was accepted as compensable, andthe Court of Workers' Compensation Claims ("trial court") entered a compensation orderawarding permanent-partial disability benefits along with future reasonable and necessaryrnedical benefits. Employee subsequently filed a petition for benefit determination statingthat she had been discharged by her treating physician, and Employer was refusing toprovide additional medical treatment. Following a hearing, the trial court ordered Employerto provide Employee with a new panel of physicians qualified and willing to treat her workrelatedinjury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board ("Appeals l3oard") affirmed.Employer has appealed and the appeal has been referred to the Special Workers'Compensation Appeals Panel pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirmthe judgment of the Appeals Board and adopt its opinion as set forth in the attachedAppendix.
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.