7,249 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1863–2026)
Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.
Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.
Collateral estoppel Whistleblower Action
Wrongful termination complaint allegations motion to seal motion to strike motion to dismiss motion for protective order final appealable order attorney-client privilege. Judgment affirmed in part reversed in part dismissed in part and remanded. The Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission's motion to dismiss the amended complaint and motion to stay and for protective order are not final appealable orders that can be reviewed in this appeal. The denial of the motion to strike and seal is a final appealable order that can be reviewed on appeal. At this initial point in the proceedings and based on the plaintiff's allegations, we find that the amended complaint is subject to the attorney-client privilege and the amended complaint should have been sealed. The matter is remanded to the trial court to seal the amended complaint and for further proceedings.
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.