7,896 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1889–2026)
Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.
Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.
Public Utilities Commission—Allegations that rates charged outside the geographical area of a "competitive pilot program" were discriminatory—R.C. 4905.31, 4905.33, and 4905.35 do not prohibit all discrimination—Discounts are permitted based on competition—Commission's dismissal of complaint affirmed.
Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with second year of suspension stayed with one-year probation—Engaging, in a professional capacity, in conduct involving discrimination prohibited by law because of race, color, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, or disability—Finding of discrimination by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or a state or federal court is not a prerequisite to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline finding that an attorney violated DR 1-102(B).
Discrimination—Age-discrimination claim premised on violation described in R.C. Chapter 4112—Statute of limitations period begins to run on date of employee-plaintiff's termination from defendant-employer.
Showing 7,051–7,100 of 7,896 rulings · Page 142 of 158
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.