3,801 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1895–2026)
Wage theft encompasses various violations of wage and hour laws, including failure to pay minimum wage, unpaid overtime, off-the-clock work, and illegal deductions from pay. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state wage laws establish minimum standards for compensation. These cases may be brought individually or as collective actions.
Employers most frequently appearing in wage theft rulings.
Workers' compensation—Industrial Commission has authority to terminate wage-loss compensation as long as "some evidence" of record supports that claimant is no longer qualified for compensation as of that date.
Mandamus to compel city of Mentor et al. to provide respondents access to certain Mentor Police Department internal affairs investigative reports, and city payroll and overtime records—Writ granted in part and denied in part—Relators entitled to award of attorney fees only insofar as their public records claims had merit.
Public employment—Police officers—Mandamus sought to compel village to pay part-time police officer who worked over forty hours for many of the weeks during period in question additional wages and benefits commensurate with that paid to full-time village police officers—Denial of writ affirmed.
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' grant of writ of mandamus ordering Industrial Commission to vacate its order and to recalculate claimant's wage loss based upon the difference between claimant's actual weekly earnings and the full weekly wage or average weekly wage affirmed.
Workers' compensation—Mandamus sought ordering Industrial Commission to vacate its denial of claimant's application for wage-loss compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Showing 3,651–3,700 of 3,801 rulings · Page 74 of 77
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.