Uber Technologies, Inc.
77 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2026)
23 trusted published court opinions across 15 distinct cases · 13 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Uber Technologies, Inc. as an employer in 77 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2026.
Of the 23 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 10 ended in a ruling for the employer, 6 had a mixed result, 5 were dismissed, and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
Plaintiffs won 2 of 23 adjudicated opinions (9%).
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, and Misclassification.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 15 distinct cases.
2 of 23 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Uber Technologies, Inc. appears in 23 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Vanison v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2026) — Defendant Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies claiming discrimination and wrongful termination. The worker argued the company violated employment laws when firing them. Read the ruling.
Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2024) — Defendant Win. Aquino sued Uber, claiming the company stole wages and wrongfully fired him. He wanted to combine his case with other drivers facing similar problems. Read the ruling.
Agha v. Uber Technologies lnc (2024) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between an Uber driver named Agha and Uber Technologies Inc. over alleged wage theft. The driver claimed that Uber had not properly paid wages owed, which is a common concern among gig workers who argue they should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (17 of 23), Wrongful Termination (14 of 23), Worker Misclassification (3 of 23). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination and Worker Misclassification.
Published opinions span California (15), New York (2), District of Columbia (1), Massachusetts (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, New York rulings, District of Columbia rulings and Massachusetts rulings.
These published opinions sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
21 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Technology employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.