Skip to main content

Faith v. Khosrowshahi

E.D.N.Y.August 11, 2025No. 2:21-cv-06913
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion to remand, finding that defendant's removal to federal court was timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(3) because the case only became removable upon receipt of medical records exceeding $75,000, which triggered the 30-day removal period.

What This Ruling Means

**Faith v. Khosrowshahi: Court Rules on Where Discrimination Case Should Be Heard** This case involved a workplace discrimination lawsuit that employee Faith filed against Chippewa Properties, LLC in state court. The company wanted to move the case to federal court instead, but Faith objected and asked the judge to send it back to state court. The court sided with the employer and allowed the case to stay in federal court. The judge ruled that the company had properly moved the case within the required 30-day deadline. The key issue was timing - the company only learned the case involved more than $75,000 in potential damages when they received medical records. Since federal courts can only hear certain cases involving large dollar amounts, this information triggered the company's right to move the case to federal court. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that employers can sometimes move discrimination cases from state to federal court if they discover the case involves significant money damages. Workers should understand that where their case is heard - state versus federal court - can affect their legal strategy, timelines, and available remedies. If you're considering a discrimination lawsuit, discuss with an attorney which court system might be better for your specific situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.