Mississippi Power Company
5 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2025)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Mississippi Power Company as an employer in 5 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate and Discrimination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
About this employer
Mississippi Power Company appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Unions Nos. 605 & 985 v. Mississippi Power & Light Co. (2006) — Defendant Win. Two electrical workers' unions sued Mississippi Power & Light Company, claiming the company's employment practices unfairly discriminated against certain groups of workers. Read the ruling.
Mississippi Power Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner (2002) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between Mississippi Power Company and its unions over the company's decision to reduce insurance benefits for future retirees. The unions argued that the company violated federal labor law by making these changes without bargaining with them first. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate and Discrimination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
These published opinions sit within the energy sector, where OSHA and environmental whistleblower-retaliation (including ERA and SOX-adjacent) claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Claim Types
Related Laws
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Energy & Utilities employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.