University of the District of Columbia
4 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2013–2024)
1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list University of the District of Columbia as an employer in 4 distinct federal employment cases between 2013 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
About this employer
University of the District of Columbia appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, District Council 20, Local 2087 v. University of the District of Columbia (2017) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between a union (AFSCME Local 2087) and the University of the District of Columbia over attorney's fees. The union had previously won a wrongful termination case for one of its members through arbitration, and the arbitrator awarded the union reasonable attorney's fees to cover the costs of… Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wrongful termination claim. Browse other wrongful termination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wrongful Termination.
This published opinion sits within the education sector, where Title IX intersects with Title VII and tenure-revocation cases raise heightened procedural protections.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Education employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.