Wenckaitis v. Specialty Contractors, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- bench trial
- State
- Illinois
- Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiffs prevailed on FLSA and state wage-law claims, recovering $84,625.57 in damages plus $296,227.55 in attorneys' fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Wenckaitis v. Specialty Contractors, Inc.
What Happened
A worker named Wenckaitis sued Specialty Contractors, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay earned wages and wrongfully terminated their employment. The dispute involved violations of federal and state wage laws designed to protect worker pay.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the worker. Wenckaitis won the case and recovered $380,852.57 total—including $84,625.57 in actual damages owed and $296,227.55 in attorney's fees and court costs. This ruling means the court found the company illegally withheld pay and that the termination was connected to wage violations.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage theft seriously. Workers who don't receive earned pay can sue employers and recover not just the missing wages, but also legal fees. This makes it financially risky for employers to cheat workers on pay. If you believe your employer owes you wages or fired you for complaining about pay issues, this ruling demonstrates you have legal protections and can potentially recover significant compensation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.