Guillen v. Armour Home Improvement, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- bench trial
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Jesus Nehemias Montano Guillen prevailed on Fair Labor Standards Act and Maryland wage-and-hour claims against Armour Home Improvement, Inc., obtaining judgment of $8,777.02 plus attorneys' fees. The court awarded $31,039.44 in reasonable fees and costs (reduced from $265,943.91 requested due to the plaintiff's counsel's overbilling and poor billing judgment).
What This Ruling Means
Guillen v. Armour Home Improvement, Inc.
What Happened
Jesus Nehemias Montano Guillen worked for Armour Home Improvement, Inc. and claimed the company didn't pay him all the wages he was owed and wrongfully fired him in violation of federal and Maryland wage laws.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Guillen. The company was ordered to pay him $8,777.02 in damages for unpaid wages. Additionally, the court required Armour to cover $31,039.44 in his legal fees and court costs, recognizing that he won his case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that workers can successfully challenge wage theft—when employers fail to pay earned wages. Winning workers can recover not only missing pay but also attorney fees, making it more affordable to hire lawyers to fight back. The case demonstrates that both federal law and state wage protections exist to protect workers' paychecks. Employees who believe they've been underpaid or retaliated against for speaking up have legal recourse.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.