Skip to main content

Su v. Sarene Services, Inc. et.al.

E.D.N.Y.July 19, 2024No. 2:20-cv-03273
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff's claims with prejudice after plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition memorandum despite an extended deadline.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Loses Wage Theft Case Due to Missed Court Deadline** A worker named Su filed a lawsuit against Sarene Services and Louisiana CVS Pharmacy claiming wage theft - essentially arguing that the companies failed to pay wages properly owed. This type of case typically involves disputes over unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or withheld paychecks. However, the court never got to examine whether the wage theft actually occurred. Instead, the judge dismissed Su's entire case because Su failed to respond to the defendants' legal arguments within the court-imposed deadline. Even though the court had given Su extra time to file the required response documents, Su still missed the extended deadline. As a result, the judge granted summary judgment in favor of the employers and threw out the case permanently. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights how crucial it is to meet all court deadlines when pursuing employment claims. Even if you have a strong case about unpaid wages, missing procedural deadlines can result in losing your case entirely before a judge ever considers the merits. Workers involved in employment lawsuits should work closely with their attorneys to ensure all court requirements and deadlines are met, as these procedural rules are strictly enforced.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.