Golden v. Verizon
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted defendant Verizon's motion to dismiss plaintiff's ADA-based employment claims as time-barred. Plaintiff did not seek leave to amend the complaint, and the case was closed.
What This Ruling Means
Golden v. Verizon: What Happened
An employee named Golden sued Verizon New York Inc., claiming the company failed to accommodate a disability as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA requires employers to make reasonable changes—like modified work schedules or equipment—to help employees with disabilities do their jobs.
What the Court Decided
The court dismissed the case without hearing it on the merits. The judge ruled that Golden waited too long to file the lawsuit. Under employment law, workers must file disability discrimination claims within a specific time frame. Golden missed this deadline, so the court threw out the case. Golden did not ask the judge for permission to fix or revise the complaint.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case is a reminder that if you believe your employer violated the ADA, you must act quickly. Waiting too long to file a complaint can cost you your right to sue, even if your claim has merit. If you face disability discrimination, consult an employment lawyer promptly to meet filing deadlines and protect your rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Golden from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.