Petry v. AAM Holding Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved settlement of FLSA wage-and-hour case in which plaintiff dancer recovered $27,518.42 in damages (38% of estimated best-case recovery) plus $19,981.58 in attorneys' fees from gentlemen's club defendant, totaling $47,500.
What This Ruling Means
Petry v. AAM Holding Corp. Settlement Summary
What Happened
A dancer employed by AAM Holding Corp., a gentlemen's club, filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay wages owed and wrongfully fired them. The case focused on wage theft—when employers don't pay workers the full amounts they've earned.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement requiring AAM Holding Corp. to pay $47,500 total. This included $27,518 in damages to compensate the worker for unpaid wages and $19,982 to cover the worker's legal fees. The settlement represents about 38% of what the worker might have won if the case had gone to trial.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can take legal action when employers withhold pay, even in industries like entertainment. While settlements often result in less money than workers might hope for, they provide real compensation without the cost and uncertainty of a full trial. Workers in any industry who believe they've been underpaid should know that legal remedies exist, and attorneys can help recover lost wages plus legal fees.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.