Skip to main content

Mlsna, Mark v. Union Pacific Railroad

W.D. Wis.June 15, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00037
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
trial verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion to strike disparate impact jury instructions (finding no jury trial right for ADA disparate impact claims) and denied defendant's appeal of the magistrate judge's order denying an untimely motion to compel production of plaintiff's tax records.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Mark Mlsna filed a discrimination lawsuit against Union Pacific Railroad under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The case was filed in federal court in June 2021, alleging that the railroad company discriminated against him because of his disability. The specific details of what type of disability discrimination occurred are not available from the court records. **What the Court Decided** The final outcome of this case is not yet available in public records. The case may still be ongoing, settled out of court, or resolved without the details being made public. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important protection for workers with disabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against qualified workers because of their disabilities. Railroad workers, like employees in other industries, have the right to file federal lawsuits when they believe they've faced disability discrimination at work. Even when specific case outcomes aren't public, these lawsuits demonstrate that workers are willing to stand up for their rights and hold large employers accountable for following disability discrimination laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.