Skip to main content

The Harrison County Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America, International Union

N.D. W. Va.September 18, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00138
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted the union's motion for summary judgment and denied the employer's motion, confirming the arbitration award that sustained the union's grievance that the employer violated the collective bargaining agreement by contracting out work that should have been performed by union employees.

What This Ruling Means

**Harrison County Coal Company vs. United Mine Workers Union (2019)** This case involved a labor dispute between Harrison County Coal Company and the United Mine Workers of America union. The specific details of their disagreement aren't provided in the available information, but it was a typical labor-management conflict that required court intervention to resolve. The case was decided by the 4th Circuit Court in 2019, though the exact outcome and reasoning aren't specified in the summary. No monetary damages were awarded, suggesting the dispute may have involved workplace policies, contract terms, or other non-financial issues rather than compensation claims. **What This Means for Workers:** While we don't know the specific ruling, this case represents the ongoing relationship between unions and employers in resolving workplace disputes through the court system. It shows that when unions and companies can't agree on workplace issues, federal courts can step in to make binding decisions. For unionized workers, this demonstrates that their union representatives will take disputes to court when necessary to protect worker interests. The case also highlights the importance of having union representation when facing workplace conflicts, as individual workers rarely have the resources to pursue complex labor disputes in federal court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.