Rosas v. M and M La Solucion Flat Fixed Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs William Rosas and Jose Orellana against M and M La Solucion Flat Fixed Inc. and its co-owners for FLSA and New York Labor Law violations, including failure to pay minimum wage, overtime, spread of hours pay, and retaliation. The court awarded damages based on plaintiffs' well-pleaded allegations and uncontroverted documentary evidence.
What This Ruling Means
Rosas v. M and M La Solucion Flat Fixed Inc.
What Happened
Two workers, William Rosas and Jose Orellana, sued their employer, M and M La Solucion Flat Fixed Inc., and its owners. The workers claimed the company failed to pay them the required minimum wage and overtime pay. They also said the company punished them for raising these concerns.
The Court's Decision
The court ruled in favor of the workers. Because the employer didn't contest the claims, the judge entered a default judgment. The court ordered the company to pay the workers $209,945.31 in damages for unpaid wages and retaliation.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers have legal protection when employers don't pay them fairly or punish them for speaking up. Courts can order companies to repay all owed wages plus additional damages. If your employer isn't paying you minimum wage, overtime, or retaliates against you for complaining, you may have legal rights to recover that money.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.