No specific laws identified for this ruling.
DOMESTIC RELATIONS – VISITATION – termination of visitation rights; abuse of discretion standard of review; the trial court reviewed the factors in R.C. 3109.051(D) and concluded it was in the minor child's best interest to terminate Appellant's visitation; however, the court did not make the required initial finding that there was clear and convincing evidence of extraordinary circumstances that would justify such termination; R.C. 3109.051(C); recorded statement should not have been accepted or considered; in camera interview; reversed and remanded.
Facemyer v. Facemyer: Court Decision Summary
What Happened
This case involved a dispute about a parent's visitation rights with their child. The employer or company Facemyer sought to terminate the other party's ability to visit their child, claiming it was in the child's best interest.
What the Court Decided
The Ohio appeals court sent the case back to the lower court to be retried. The court found that the lower court made a mistake: it ended the visitation rights without first providing clear and convincing proof of serious, unusual circumstances that would justify such a dramatic action. Additionally, the court improperly accepted a recorded statement as evidence that shouldn't have been admitted.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that courts must follow proper procedures and meet strict standards before making major decisions affecting families. Even when someone believes they're acting in a child's best interest, they must present solid evidence and follow legal requirements. The decision protects workers and parents by ensuring courts don't make irreversible family decisions without meeting high standards of proof and following correct procedures.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Facemyer from the same court.
Arbitration; arbitrability; motion to compel arbitration; motion to stay; Ohio Arbitration Act; Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"); interstate commerce; Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 ("EFAA"); Franken Amendment; sexual harassment; hostile environment;…
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.