Skip to main content

Rivera v. Altice Technical Services US, LLC

D. Conn.February 25, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00541
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Travelers, holding that the fire occurred at an unnamed location not listed in the policy's Approved Locations schedule, entitling plaintiff to only the $250,000 coverage limit rather than the $600,000 limit claimed.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute over insurance coverage limits after a fire occurred at a business location. Rivera claimed they were entitled to $600,000 in coverage from their insurance policy with The Travelers Indemnity Company. However, Travelers argued that the fire happened at a location that wasn't specifically listed in the policy's approved locations, which would limit coverage to only $250,000. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with Travelers and granted summary judgment in their favor. The judge ruled that since the fire occurred at an unnamed location that wasn't included in the policy's "Approved Locations schedule," Rivera was only entitled to the lower $250,000 coverage limit, not the $600,000 they had requested. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling highlights the importance of carefully reviewing insurance policy details, especially location-specific coverage limits. Workers and business owners should ensure that all relevant business locations are properly listed in their insurance policies to avoid reduced coverage in case of accidents or disasters. When reviewing any insurance policy, pay close attention to geographical restrictions and approved location schedules that could affect your coverage amounts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.