Skip to main content

Nadeau v. Twin River Paper Company, LLC

MESUPERCTNovember 13, 2019No. AROcv-18-153
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Harold Stewart
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

Claim Types

RetaliationWhistleblower

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, finding that plaintiff's Maine Whistleblowers' Protection Act retaliation claim was preempted by Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act because resolution of the claim would require active interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.