Potts v. Marley Engineered Products
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- South Carolina
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff's ADA employment discrimination claim was dismissed for failure to timely file suit within 90 days of receiving the EEOC right-to-sue letter. The court rejected plaintiff's request for equitable tolling, finding that pro se status and difficulty obtaining counsel do not constitute extraordinary circumstances warranting an exception to the statutory filing deadline.
What This Ruling Means
Potts v. Marley Engineered Products: Case Summary
What Happened
An employee filed a lawsuit against Marley Engineered Products claiming the company failed to make workplace accommodations for a disability under federal disability rights law. Before suing in court, the employee had filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that investigates workplace discrimination.
What the Court Decided
The court dismissed the case without hearing it on the merits. The problem wasn't whether the employer actually violated disability rights—it was a timing issue. After receiving permission to sue from the EEOC, the employee waited longer than 90 days to file the lawsuit. The court rejected the employee's argument that special circumstances (representing himself without a lawyer and struggling to find legal help) justified missing this deadline.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case underscores that strict deadlines apply in employment discrimination cases. Workers who receive an EEOC right-to-sue letter must file their lawsuit promptly—within 90 days—or risk losing their case entirely, regardless of the strength of their discrimination claim. Even facing challenges like finding a lawyer won't extend this deadline.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.