Skip to main content

Li v. Chung LLC

W.D. Va.May 5, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00025
Plaintiff WinChung LLC$250,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for wage theft.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: Li v. Chung LLC** This case involved a worker named Li who filed a lawsuit against their employer, Chung LLC, claiming wage theft. Li alleged that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other wage protections for workers. Unfortunately, there isn't enough information available to determine how this case was resolved. The court records show the case as "unresolvable," meaning we cannot tell whether Li won or lost, or if the parties reached a settlement agreement outside of court. No damages or monetary awards were reported. **What This Means for Workers:** Even though we don't know the outcome of this specific case, it highlights an important right that all workers have. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees from wage theft, which can include unpaid overtime, being paid below minimum wage, or not being paid for all hours worked. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage laws can file complaints with the Department of Labor or pursue legal action in court. While not every case results in a clear victory, these laws exist to protect workers' right to fair compensation for their labor.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.