Skip to main content

Vazquez v. Cousins Grocery And Grill, Inc.

E.D.N.Y.May 13, 2025No. 1:21-cv-04528
Plaintiff WinCousins Grocery and Grill Inc.$136,212 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on New York Labor Law minimum wage and overtime claims. Court awarded $136,212 in unpaid wages and liquidated damages plus prejudgment and post-judgment interest. FLSA claims were dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to establish enterprise coverage.

What This Ruling Means

**Vazquez v. Cousins Grocery And Grill, Inc.: Court Dismisses Wage Violation Case** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Vazquez and their employer, Cousins Grocery And Grill, Inc. Vazquez claimed the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. The court dismissed Vazquez's case, meaning the judge threw it out without awarding any money or other remedies to the worker. While the specific details of why the case was dismissed aren't provided in the available information, dismissals in wage cases often occur due to issues like missing deadlines, insufficient evidence, or procedural problems. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning wage violation cases requires careful preparation and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage laws should document everything carefully, including work hours, pay stubs, and any communications about pay. It's also important to act quickly since there are strict time limits for filing these types of claims. When facing potential wage violations, workers should consider consulting with an employment attorney to ensure their rights are properly protected.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.