Skip to main content

Rodgers v. Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C. Corp.

M.D. Fla.June 17, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00549
Plaintiff WinColumbia Psychiatric Associates, PA$625,177 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Jury found Dr. Lewkowiez liable for medical negligence and awarded plaintiff $625,177 in actual damages for memory loss caused by ECT treatments. Appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute between a patient and Dr. Lewkowiez regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatments. The patient claimed that the ECT treatments were performed negligently, causing significant memory loss and other damages. **What the Court Decided** A jury found Dr. Lewkowiez liable for medical negligence in how the ECT treatments were administered. They awarded the patient $625,177 in actual damages to compensate for the memory loss and other harm caused by the improper treatment. When Dr. Lewkowiez appealed, asking the higher court to overturn the jury's decision, the appellate court refused and upheld the original verdict. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this appears to be a medical malpractice case rather than a traditional employment dispute, it demonstrates that professionals can be held personally accountable for negligent conduct that harms others. For healthcare workers and other professionals, this case reinforces that proper training, following established protocols, and maintaining professional standards are crucial. When professionals fail to meet accepted standards of care, they can face significant financial liability for the damages they cause.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.