Mejia v. Ke Lai Xiang Number One Restaurant Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- bench trial
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on New York Labor Law wage and hour claims after a bench trial, obtaining $63,060.54 in damages plus attorneys' fees and costs totaling $50,991.
What This Ruling Means
Court Ruling: Mejia v. Ke Lai Xiang Number One Restaurant Inc.
What Happened
A worker named Mejia sued Ke Lai Xiang Number One Restaurant Inc., alleging the restaurant failed to pay proper wages. The case centered on wage theft claims under New York labor laws, which require employers to pay workers for all hours worked at least minimum wage.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of Mejia after hearing evidence at trial. The judge found the restaurant violated wage and hour laws and ordered it to pay $113,751.54 in total compensation. This included $63,060.54 in back wages owed to Mejia, plus $50,991 to cover the worker's attorney's fees and legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can successfully challenge employers who don't pay them fairly. New York courts will hold restaurants accountable for wage violations and make them pay not only missing wages but also cover workers' legal expenses. This ruling reinforces that employees have legal protections and recourse when employers unlawfully withhold pay.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Mejia from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.