Skip to main content

Hess v. Hallrich Incorporated

N.D. OhioJuly 9, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00077
SettlementSFR X Holdings, LLC$8,125 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court approved a settlement in an FLSA collective action where delivery drivers alleged improper vehicle reimbursement and resulting minimum wage violations. Plaintiffs received $8,125 in total settlement payments ($3,375 to Hess, $4,750 to Lindenauer), plus $13,866.93 in attorneys' fees and $6,133.07 in litigation costs.

What This Ruling Means

Hess v. Hallrich Incorporated Settlement Summary

What Happened

Delivery drivers employed by SFR X Holdings, LLC claimed the company improperly handled vehicle reimbursement payments. This practice allegedly prevented workers from earning the federal minimum wage. The drivers filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for lost wages.

What the Court Decided

The court approved a settlement requiring the company to pay $8,125 to the affected workers—$3,375 to one driver and $4,750 to another. The company also had to cover $13,866.93 in attorney fees and $6,133.07 in court costs, totaling approximately $28,125.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case highlights that employers cannot use deductions or reimbursements as a way to reduce workers' pay below minimum wage. Even if a company requires employees to cover vehicle expenses, it remains responsible for ensuring workers earn at least minimum wage. If deductions prevent this, workers may have grounds for a wage theft claim. This ruling reinforces that workers should track their pay carefully and speak up if deductions make their earnings fall below minimum wage requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Hess from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.