Roque Perez v. A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- Michigan
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff obtained default judgment against employer for wage and hour violations under FLSA and Michigan law, with court awarding $311,017.00 in unpaid wages, back pay, and liquidated damages.
What This Ruling Means
Roque Perez v. A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C.
What Happened
Roque Perez worked for A&A Staffing Solutions and claimed the company failed to pay him all wages he earned. He also alleged the employer took action against him for complaining about these wage violations.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Perez's favor and ordered A&A Staffing Solutions to pay him $311,017 in total damages. This amount covered unpaid wages, back pay owed to him, and additional penalties designed to punish the employer for the violation.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore wage laws. When companies fail to pay workers what they've earned, courts can order them to pay not only the missing wages but extra money as punishment. The case also shows that workers have legal protection if they're retaliated against for speaking up about wage problems. If you believe your employer has underpaid you, this ruling demonstrates you have rights and courts will enforce them.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.