Skip to main content

Roque Perez v. A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C

W.D. Mich.August 15, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00331
Plaintiff WinA&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C.$311,017 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftRetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment and was awarded $311,017 in unpaid wages, back pay, and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act for failure to pay minimum wage, overtime, and unlawful retaliation.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Roque Perez filed a petition for habeas corpus against A&A Staffing Solutions L.L.C. A habeas corpus petition is typically used when someone claims they are being illegally detained or imprisoned. However, the court records indicate this case involved employment law claims, suggesting there may have been broader workplace-related issues at stake. **What the Court Decided** The federal court dismissed Perez's petition without prejudice. This means the case was thrown out, but Perez could potentially file it again later. The court dismissed the case because Perez had not yet exhausted his options in state court - he still had an appeal pending before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that needed to be resolved first. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important procedural rule: workers must generally go through all available state court processes before bringing certain types of cases to federal court. If you're involved in legal proceedings that span both employment and criminal matters, you typically cannot skip ahead to federal court while state appeals are still ongoing. Workers should work with attorneys to ensure they follow the proper legal sequence when pursuing multiple types of claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.