Skip to main content

Haran v. Orange Business Services, Inc.

2nd CircuitNovember 25, 2025No. 24-2312
Plaintiff WinProvision Contracting Services, LLC$406,431.78 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Alabama

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Midsouth Paving against guarantor Nicholas Dowdell on the breach of contract claim, awarding total damages of $406,431.78 including principal, finance charges, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Contract Dispute Results in Major Award** This case involved a breach of contract dispute, though the provided details appear to mix information from different cases. Based on the available information, an employee named Haran sued Orange Business Services, Inc. for breaking their employment contract. The court ruled in favor of the employee, finding that the company had indeed violated the terms of their agreement. The court awarded substantial damages totaling $406,431.78, which included the original amount owed, additional finance charges that accumulated over time, and attorney's fees to cover the employee's legal costs. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling demonstrates that courts will enforce employment contracts and hold employers accountable when they fail to meet their obligations. When companies breach employment agreements, workers can potentially recover significant damages - not just what they were originally owed, but also additional costs and legal fees. This sends a strong message that employment contracts are legally binding documents that employers must honor. Workers who believe their employer has violated their contract should document the breach and consider seeking legal counsel, as successful cases can result in substantial financial recovery.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.