Skip to main content

Farmer v. Mizuho Sec. USA LLC

N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026No. Index No. 151348/24|Appeal No. 6568|Case No. 2025-06032|
Plaintiff WinMizuho Securities USA LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
2026 NY Slip Op 02920
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHostile Work EnvironmentWrongful TerminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Appellate Division reversed the lower court's dismissal and reinstated plaintiff's gender discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the NY State and City Human Rights Laws.

Browse more:Discrimination casesHostile Work Environment casesWrongful Termination casesRetaliation cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Mizuho Securities USA LLC RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from New YorkMore discrimination casesMore finance employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.