Skip to main content

David Stone v. Pima County

ARIZCTAPPJune 11, 2026No. 2 CA-CV 2025-0219
RemandedPima County
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Arizona
Circuit
9th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Religious DiscriminationFailure to AccommodateWrongful TerminationRetaliation

Outcome

Court reversed summary judgment and remanded, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the County's COVID-19 vaccination accommodation process reasonably preserved the employee's employment status under Title VII's religious accommodation requirements.

Browse more:Religious Discrimination casesFailure to Accommodate casesWrongful Termination casesRetaliation cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Pima County RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from ArizonaMore religious discrimination casesMore government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.