No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Washington Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment for six caregivers, holding that the live-in worker exemption to the state Minimum Wage Act violates the privileges and immunities clause of the Washington State Constitution.
Bolina v. AssureCare Adult Home LLC
What Happened
Six caregivers who worked at AssureCare Adult Home LLC sued over unpaid wages and failure to provide reasonable accommodations for their disabilities. The employer had classified them as "live-in workers" and claimed they weren't entitled to minimum wage under a state law exemption.
What the Court Decided
The Washington Supreme Court ruled that the live-in worker exemption to Washington's Minimum Wage Act is unconstitutional. The court determined that this exemption violated workers' rights under the Washington State Constitution. The court sided with the caregivers on their wage theft claims.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling is significant because it protects live-in workers—like home care aides and domestic workers—from being excluded from minimum wage protections. Employers can no longer use someone's live-in status as a reason to deny them proper pay. This decision strengthens wage protections for vulnerable workers, many of whom are underpaid due to their live-in arrangements. The ruling applies across Washington State and signals that constitutional protections outweigh certain employer exemptions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.