Benjamin Danielson, V. Seattle Childrens Hospital
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- jury verdict
- State
- Washington
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Dr. Danielson prevailed on claims of hostile work environment and retaliation under Washington's Law Against Discrimination. A jury awarded him $21 million in damages, and the appellate court affirmed the verdict and damages award.
What This Ruling Means
Benjamin Danielson v. Seattle Children's Hospital
What Happened
Dr. Benjamin Danielson worked at Seattle Children's Hospital and filed a lawsuit claiming he faced a hostile work environment and retaliation. He reported that he experienced discrimination at work and was treated badly after complaining about it.
What the Court Decided
A jury found in Dr. Danielson's favor, awarding him $21 million in damages. The higher appellate court reviewed the case and confirmed the jury's decision was correct, letting the full award stand.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that workers have strong legal protections when they face mistreatment at work based on discrimination. It shows that employers can face serious financial consequences—including substantial damages—when they create hostile work environments and punish employees for speaking up. For workers, this ruling demonstrates that complaints about discrimination are taken seriously by courts, and that Washington state law provides meaningful protection and compensation for those who experience workplace discrimination or retaliation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.