Skip to main content

Mosaica Education, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board

Pa. Commw. Ct.May 8, 2007Cited 14 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Colins, Jubelirer, Flaherty
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the Prevailing Wage Appeals Board's decision that Mosaica Education, Inc. was required to comply with the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act for renovations performed for the Ronald H. Brown Charter School, rejecting Mosaica's arguments that it was not a contractor and that public funds were not used.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Mosaica Education, Inc. performed renovation work at the Ronald H. Brown Charter School in Pennsylvania. The state said Mosaica had to pay workers according to Pennsylvania's Prevailing Wage Act, which requires contractors working on public projects to pay workers at least the local prevailing wage rates. Mosaica disagreed, arguing they weren't actually a "contractor" under the law and that public money wasn't being used for the project, so the prevailing wage rules shouldn't apply to them. **What the Court Decided** The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court sided against Mosaica. The court upheld the Prevailing Wage Appeals Board's ruling that Mosaica was indeed required to follow the state's prevailing wage law for the charter school renovation work. The court rejected both of Mosaica's main arguments. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers on charter school construction projects by ensuring they receive fair wages. It clarifies that companies can't avoid paying prevailing wages simply by claiming they're not "contractors" or that public funds aren't involved. Workers on similar public education projects can expect to be paid according to local wage standards, providing better compensation and working conditions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Mosaica Education, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.