Skip to main content

People Ex Rel. Department of Labor v. 2000 W. Madison Liquor Corp.

Ill. App. Ct.September 29, 2009No. 1-08-0902Cited 4 times
Plaintiff WinMain Street Liquors$12,683.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Karnezis
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's finding that Main Street Liquors violated the Illinois Equal Pay Act of 2003 by paying female employee Mary Arrington less than a male employee for substantially similar work. Main Street Liquors was ordered to pay $4,061.25 in back wages plus additional penalties totaling $12,683.75.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** The Illinois Department of Labor sued Main Street Liquors (2000 W. Madison Liquor Corp.) for paying a female employee, Mary Arrington, less money than a male coworker who was doing basically the same job. This violated Illinois's Equal Pay Act of 2003, which requires employers to pay men and women equally for substantially similar work. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of the Department of Labor and the female employee. The appeals court upheld the original trial court's decision that Main Street Liquors had illegally discriminated by paying unequal wages based on gender. The company was ordered to pay $4,061.25 in back wages to make up for what the employee should have earned, plus additional penalties, bringing the total damages to $12,683.75. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that Illinois takes equal pay laws seriously and will enforce them. Workers who believe they're being paid less than coworkers of the opposite sex for similar work have legal protections. The state can investigate these cases and force employers to pay back wages plus penalties, making discrimination costly for businesses.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.