Skip to main content

White v. Department of Employment Security

Ill. App. Ct.September 21, 2007No. 1-06-3075Cited 12 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tully
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the Board of Review's decision denying unemployment insurance benefits to plaintiff George White, finding that he voluntarily left employment without good cause attributable to his employer under section 601(A) of the Illinois Unemployment Insurance Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** George White worked for Windward Roofing and Construction and later applied for unemployment benefits from the Illinois Department of Employment Security. The department denied his claim, saying he quit his job voluntarily without a good reason related to his employer's actions. White disagreed and appealed this decision through the state's review process, but the appeals board upheld the denial. White then took his case to court. **What the Court Decided** The Illinois Appellate Court sided with the state agency and upheld the denial of unemployment benefits. The court agreed that White had voluntarily left his job without "good cause" that could be blamed on his employer's behavior or working conditions. Under Illinois unemployment law, workers who quit without employer-related good cause are not eligible for benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important rule about unemployment benefits: simply quitting your job usually makes you ineligible for benefits unless you can prove your employer caused the situation. Workers should understand that unemployment insurance is primarily designed for people who lose their jobs through no fault of their own, such as layoffs or firings for non-misconduct reasons.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in White from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.