Skip to main content

Bloom v. Municipal Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund

Ill. App. Ct.June 9, 2003No. 1-02-0236Cited 13 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McNULTY
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Illinois appellate court affirmed the pension fund's denial of Bloom's benefits, holding that his felony tax conviction was sufficiently connected to his employment as an alderman to trigger the statutory disqualification under the Illinois Pension Code.

What This Ruling Means

**Bloom v. Municipal Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund (2003)** This case involved a former Chicago alderman named Bloom who was denied his pension benefits after being convicted of a felony tax crime. Bloom had worked as an elected city official and paid into the Municipal Employees' pension fund, expecting to receive retirement benefits. However, after his criminal conviction, the pension fund refused to pay him, citing Illinois law that disqualifies certain convicted felons from receiving pension benefits. Bloom challenged this decision in court, arguing that his tax conviction wasn't related enough to his job as an alderman to justify losing his pension. The Illinois appellate court disagreed and sided with the pension fund. The court ruled that Bloom's felony conviction was sufficiently connected to his employment as a public official to trigger the state law that strips pension benefits from convicted felons. **What this means for workers:** Public employees should be aware that criminal convictions, especially felonies, can result in the loss of pension benefits even if they've paid into the system for years. The connection between the crime and the job doesn't have to be direct—courts may find a sufficient link to justify benefit forfeiture under state pension laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Bloom from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.