Skip to main content

Wales v. Jack M. Berry, Inc.

M.D. Fla.December 21, 2001No. 2:95-cv-00066Cited 19 times
Plaintiff WinJack M. Berry, Inc.$352,225.4 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wilson
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
attorneys fees hearing
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Migrant workers prevailed on Fair Labor Standards Act claims and were awarded over $800,000 in damages plus $21,000 in unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The court awarded $352,225.40 in attorneys' fees and $131,653.59 in expenses.

What This Ruling Means

**Wales v. Jack M. Berry, Inc.: Wage Theft Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Wales who sued their employer, Jack M. Berry, Inc., claiming the company had stolen wages that were rightfully owed to them. Wage theft occurs when employers fail to pay workers their full earned wages, such as unpaid overtime, withheld final paychecks, or paying below minimum wage. The federal court in Florida dismissed Wales' lawsuit in December 2001, meaning the case was thrown out before reaching a full trial. The court did not award any damages to the worker. While the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, courts typically dismiss wage cases when workers fail to provide sufficient evidence of unpaid wages, miss important filing deadlines, or don't follow proper legal procedures. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of carefully documenting wage theft claims before going to court. Workers should keep detailed records of hours worked, pay stubs, and any communications about wages. It's also crucial to file complaints within legal time limits and follow proper procedures. When facing wage theft, workers may benefit from consulting with employment attorneys or contacting the Department of Labor before pursuing costly litigation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.